Chair: Matt Smith, Michigan Department of Transportation, email@example.com
Co-Chair: Roger Berg, DENSO, firstname.lastname@example.org
The purpose of this TWG is to identify cross-cutting issues related to infrastructure operators, OEMs and suppliers, and discuss possible approaches towards resolving them. Examples of known issues include: access to vehicle based data, privacy, cybersecurity, and liability for the infrastructure operators, OEMs, and suppliers. This TWG will discuss and expand upon these and other issues and develop a scope and a work plan. Membership will be comprised of a combination of public and private sector members, representing all aspects of the industry. TWG members will work together to develop descriptions of the actions that are needed to resolve the issues addressed by the group.
TWG 3 Roster:
|#||First Name||Last Name||Organization|
|3||Aurenice||Oliveira||Michigan Technological University|
|5||Bill||Mahoney||National Center for Atmospheric Research|
|7||Brian||DePan||Jacobs Engineering Group|
|8||Carl||Andersen||USDOT - FHWA|
|11||Darryl||Dawson||ITS Engineering, Ltd. (ITSE)|
|12||Deborah||Curtis||USDOT - FHWA|
|15||Ed||Bradley||Toyota Motor North America|
|17||Eric||Tennessen||Warning Lites of Minnesota|
|18||Eryca||McCartin Dinsdale||Oregon DOT|
|20||Gary||Wallace||SiriusXM Connected Vehicles|
|22||Gregory||Davis||USDOT - FHWA|
|25||Jack||Hall||Contra Costa Transportation Authority|
|26||Jeff||Price||GRIDSMART Technologies, Inc.|
|27||John||Bassett||New York State DOT|
|31||Jonathan||Riehl||Wisconsin TOPS Lab|
|32||Kevin||Ro||Toyota Motor North America, Inc.|
|33||Kiel||Ova||Traffic Technology Services, Inc.|
|34||Larry||Head||University of Arizona|
|36||Masashi||Yamamoto||Mazda North American Operations|
|39||Melissa||Tooley||Texas A&M Transportation Institute|
|42||Mohammed||Hadi||Florida international university|
|46||Oliver||Brandl||Kapsch TrafficCom AG|
|47||Patrick||Brunett||Cohda Wireless America LLC|
|48||Patrick||Chan||Consensus Systems Technologies (ConSysTec)|
|49||Paul||Carlson||City of Columbus|
|50||Paul||Steinman||Florida Department of Transportation|
|52||Peter||Rafferty||University of Wisconsin-Madison|
|55||Randell||Iwasaki||Contra Costa Transportation Authority|
|58||Robert||Arnold||USDOT - FHWA|
|60||Robert||Rupert||USDOT - FHWA|
|61||Roger||Berg||DENSO International America, Inc.|
|62||Roy||Goudy||Nissan Technical Center North America|
|65||Steven||Siko||Fiat Chrysler Automobiles|
|68||William||Mahoney||National Center for Atmospheric Research|
|69||Dan||Dietrich||FLIR Intelligent Transportation Systems|
Table 1 – TWG #3 Roster
V2I Issues of Interest to TWG 3
The TWG 1 Work Plan for June 2015 – June 2016 includes activities to contribute to four issues surrounding V2I Deployments. The issues TWG 3 will contribute to are as follows:
Issue 1: V2X Applications
Issue 3: V2I Data
Issue 7: Understanding the Benefits and Costs of V2I Deployment and Operation
Issue 16: Operators and OEM Goals for V2I
TWG 1 June 2015 – June 2016 Work Plan Summary
TWG 1 members approved a Work Plan for the Technical Working Group as part of their monthly meetings. This Work Plan has been updated as additional information has become available describing the activities of other TWGs. The table below provides a synthesis of the activities planned to contribute to resolving each of the four issues identified above:
|V2I Deployment Issues
(Note: issues are not prioritized)
|Anticipated TWG 3 Actions||Anticipated Completion Date|
|Issue 1: V2X Applications||Support other TWG’s in the identification and prioritization of V2I applications.||2/2016|
|Issue 3: V2I Data||Aggregate perspectives from group members and their contacts with DOTs, OEMs, and other partnerships, define the issues that must be addressed about V2I data, prioritize them to share the results with TWG 2||2/2016|
|Issue 7: Understanding the Benefits and Costs of V2I Deployment and Operation||Aggregate perspectives from group members and their contacts with DOTs, OEMs, and other partnerships, use case studies to identify application value and costs, share V2I survey result of TWG 1 with OEMs||2/2016|
|Issue 16: Operators and OEM Goals for V2I||Develop a consensus list of prioritized goals for deploying V2I solutions.||8/2016|
Table 2 – Summary of TWG #3 Approaches to the V2I Issues
TWG 3 Chronology of Monthly Meetings & Syntheses of Results
TWG members have chosen to meet monthly by webinar. The following synthesis provides high-level summaries of the webinars, and dates of future webinars that have not yet occurred.
July 16, 2015 Webinar Summary:
The July webinar was the first webinar of TWG 3, and the first meeting since the in-person meeting in Pittsburgh. The group was polled on high priority issues to be addressed by TWG 3. The group discussed specific actions related to the work plan.
The August webinar featured CAMP’s Mike Shulman’s presentation on V2I safety applications. The work plan was also discussed by solicitation of group members for identified group activities.
During the September webinar, Matt Smith (Chair of TWG 3) presented a summary of the V2I DC Executive Committee meeting held on September 10, 2015. The Executive Committee has established the V2I DC initial focus areas for V2I applications to be: Intersections, Queue Warning Systems, Work Zone Management, and Curve Warnings. Guest speaker Walt Fehr, with USDOT, gave an USDOT ITS JPO update. Several volunteers were identified on the meeting to participate in the two activities in identifying application value and costs, and data issues.
During the October webinar, Steve Kuciemba (PB) and Melissa Tooley (TTI) were identified to lead the two activities. Additionally, Matt informed the group how different working group coordinate and collaborate together. Guest speaker Mike Shulman, with CAMP, introduced the Security Certificate Management System (SCMS) to the group.
The November webinar featured guest speaker Colin Castle, Michigan DOT, talked about Connected Vehicle data use from Michigan DOT’s perspective. Steve Kuciemba (PB) and Melissa Tooley (TTI) briefed group members their rudimentary plans in conducting the two activities of the group.
<<Attach meeting summary, attendee list, and presentation slides as attachment(s)>>
Note: December webinar was canceled as the two activity leads have been gathering input from fellow group members. Team meeting for activity members may be scheduled to discuss two identified issues of the group.
February 25, 2016--Update:
Working Group 3 did not host any meetings in January and February. Instead, TWG3 conducted several one-on-one and group interviews to gather group members’ perspectives on value and costs, and data issues of V2I applications. The results from these interviews are being assembled and will be reported to the group members on the next call, scheduled for Thursday, March 10, 2016 from 2:30 – 4:00 p.m. EST.
March 10, 2016 Call: Two discussion drafts that TWG 3 has produced in addressing the two activities on identifying value and cost and data issues in V2I applications are shown in the PDFs below:
V2I Safety Application Data Issues
V2I Safety Application Implementation Value
Addtional 2016 Webinar Information to Come:
To be posted when completed. For information about the webinar, email Adrian Guan at: email@example.com.