The intent of this page is to share cooperative automated transportation (CAT) policy frameworks and statements identified by the Policy, Legislative, and Regulatory (PLR) Working Group.
The frameworks included in the table below are not intended to be an all-inclusive list. Rather, the intent is to share the examples that this working group has identified. If you would like to add CAT policy statements to the list below, please email Pat Zelinski information about the statements at pzelinski@aashto.org. A more comprehensive list of CAT legislation is available from NCSL.
Agency / Organization |
Content |
Summary of Content |
---|---|---|
Arizona |
|
|
New South Wales, Australia | Connected and Automated Vehicle Plan | Five-year CAV Plan for New South Wales with clear goals and actions to embrace technology and address potential challenges like cybersecurity and ensuring safe interactions between automated vehicles and other road users. |
Centralina Council of Governments, Great Charlotte Area |
|
|
Colorado | CAT Program |
Includes mission, purpose, issues, objectives, priorities, and risks associated with the Connected and Autonomous Technology in Colorado.
|
General | I-95 Corridor Coalition CAV Workshop Report | Overview of CAV initiatives, barriers to implementation, next steps. |
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers: Alliance Model State AV Bill | Includes definitions, driverless operations of ADS-equipped vehicles, operation of ADS-equipped vehicles with a conventional human driver, insurance, reporting of accidents, on-demand driverless capable vehicle network, controlling authority, and construction. | |
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA): Guidelines for the safe Testing of Highly Automated Vehicles |
This report contains voluntary recommendations for jurisdictions that choose to regulate testing and deployment of HAVs.
|
|
American Trucking Association (ATA): Automated Truck Policy (October 24, 2017) |
|
|
This document is intended to provide a framework as metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) incorporate vehicle connectivity and automation into their metropolitan transportation planning process and work to guide its deployment to help meet regional transportation needs and goals. It is intended to assist MPOs as they explore the implications of vehicle connectivity and automation for the transportation system, its users, and the concept of mobility. | ||
Autonomous Vehicle Policy Framework Summit Final Product Report |
The Autonomous Vehicle Policy Framework Summit brought together top-level people working with AVs from various states to formulate draft policies related to AVs. This document addresses a wide range of issues including, but not limited to, greater access, equity, reducing transportation-related greenhouse gases, vehicle safety, public health, land use planning issues, community livability, parking and managing the streets. The effort builds on past policy discussions to offer a framework for governmental bodies to better prepare for AVs. |
|
ITS America: Shailen Bhatt Testimony on Innovation and America’s Infrastructure: Examining the Effects of Emerging Autonomous Technologies on America’s Roads and Bridges |
Describes a vision for a better future transformed by intelligent mobility, highlighting:
|
|
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws: Uniform Automated Operation of Vehicles Act | The Automated Operation of Vehicles Act addresses a narrow but foundational set of the many legal and policy issues raised by automated driving. It is intended to explicitly accommodate and specifically regulate the automated operation of automated vehicles. | |
Society of Actuaries: Market Framework and Outlook for Automated Vehicle Systems | Written for actuaries and the insurance industry. The goal of the report is to classify the major technologies and their pace of development and thereby understand the market direction and possible implications for vehicle safety. | |
Georgia | Report of the Georgia House Autonomous Vehicle Technology Study Committee |
|
Florida |
Provides recommendations for additional legislative and regulatory action for the safe testing and operation of motor vehicles equipped with autonomous technology.
|
|
Connected and Automated (CAV) Business Plan (January 2019) |
|
|
Illinois |
Sets the following goals for the next 5-10 years:
|
|
Louisiana | Investigation into Legislative Action Needed to Accommodate the Future Safe Operation of Autonomous Vehicles in the State of Louisiana |
|
Maryland | Maryland CAV Strategic Framework |
|
Massachusetts | Report of Autonomous Vehicles Working Group |
Overview of technologies, governance, and policy considerations.
|
Michigan | Overview of CAV technologies, Michigan initiatives, goals and strategies, current projects and tactical actions, strategy alignment and opportunities. | |
Minnesota | The Governor’s Advisory Council on Connected and Automated Vehicles Executive Report |
|
North Carolina | Overview of CAVs and state of industry, and within North Carolina: current initiatives, laws and regulations, and activities roadmap for seven key initiatives. | |
Oregon |
Describes:
|
|
Pennsylvania |
Describes:
|
|
PA Joint Statewide CAV Strategic Plan |
Overview of CAV perspective, business case, and plan development with gaps; CAV program vision, mission, strategic goals, objectives, recommended steps, and proposed pilot projects.
|
|
Pennsylvania Turnpike | CAV Program Roadmap | Overview of CAVs, roadmap goals, focus of applications, needs, prioritized CAV applications, short-term projects, funding sources, and implementation strategy for short-, mid-, and long-term. |
Virginia | Virginia Automated 20xx Strategic Plan |
Describes the included key elements and the process for drafting the framework under development. |
Connected and Automated Vehicle Program Plan |
|
|
Washington State DOT (WSDOT) |
To achieve this vision, this policy framework sets shared expectations to guide and monitor technology implementation. The framework is intended to spur innovation and investment while improving safety, mobility, and transportation system efficiency. |
|
Washington, D.C. |
Structured around four principles: 1. Safety - Reduce driver, passenger, and pedestrian injuries and fatalities, and protect consumer data 2. Equity - Improve access across geographies and populations, improve accessibility 3. Efficiency - Reduce the inefficiencies and negative externalities of congestion, reduce costs, reduce pollution, improve movement 4. Sustainability - Improve environmental impacts, be financially sustainable, adapt to changes |
|
Wisconsin |
|